Business and Asset Complexity
The Business Will Be Read Line by Line
For many owners, a divorce is the closest anyone has ever looked at the company. Preparation decides whether that scrutiny becomes a problem.
By Beth McCormack
Most business owners I meet have been through due diligence before. A lender, an investor, perhaps a buyer who walked away. They know what it feels like to have someone go through the books.
Divorce is different. The person on the other side knows how the household was run, which expenses were personal, and how the company paid for the life the family lived. Their valuator will read every line with that knowledge in hand.
Three questions about every business
In a divorce, a closely held business or professional practice is looked at from three directions at once.
The first is what it is worth. A valuator studies earnings, growth, the industry, and how much of the value depends on the owner personally.
The second is what it really pays. An owner’s true income often differs from the salary on the tax return. A company car, travel, a family member on payroll, or personal costs the business covers can all be added back. The result affects both the value of the business and support.
The third is how it was built. Illinois law treats a business started or grown during the marriage differently from one an owner brought into it. Even a company owned before the wedding is not automatically off the table. If one spouse’s significant work during the marriage made it grow substantially, and that work was not reasonably paid, the marital estate can be entitled to reimbursement.
Organized records are the best preparation
The most useful thing an owner can do is make the records easy to understand. That does not mean changing anything. It means organizing what already exists: tax returns, financial statements, the general ledger, payroll, loan documents, and the operating or shareholder agreement.
What hurts is the opposite. Revenue that dips the month a divorce is mentioned. A bonus that is suddenly deferred. A large customer whose payments begin arriving a little later than usual. Experienced valuators have seen all of it, and so have judges. An owner who appears to be managing the numbers loses credibility that is very hard to win back, and that loss shadows every other issue in the case.
Partners and their agreements
Many businesses have owners who are not part of the marriage. A medical group, an accounting firm, a family company, a venture with a college roommate. Their agreements often control what can happen to an ownership interest, how it is valued, and who may hold it.
Those documents need to be read early. A buy-sell provision may set a formula price. A shareholder agreement may restrict any transfer to a spouse. Partners will want reassurance that operations, confidential information, and clients will stay out of the case. Handled well, most of them never feel the divorce at all.
Two valuators or one
In some cases each side hires its own valuator. In others, the spouses agree on a single neutral valuator whose work both can rely on. Separate valuators can make sense when the stakes or the disagreement are large. A neutral often saves time, money, and the experience of watching two professionals describe the same company as if it were two different businesses.
Which approach fits depends on the business, the people, and how much trust remains. It is one of the first strategic decisions in the case.
Cash decides what is workable
A business can be worth a great deal on paper and hold very little cash. Any agreement has to account for that. Pulling too much from the company to fund a settlement can weaken it, which hurts both spouses. Tax consequences matter as well, and Illinois courts consider them when dividing property.
The right structure pays the other spouse in full and leaves the company healthy. That usually takes the owner’s accountant, the valuator, and often a wealth manager working from the same set of numbers.
The spouse who is not in the business
When I represent the spouse who does not run the company, the goal is the same clarity from the other direction. That spouse needs to understand what the business earns, what it is worth, and whether the payments promised will actually arrive. Transparency protects both people, and it is far less expensive than a fight over what the books mean.
I help people divorce with a scalpel instead of a machete. There is far less blood and pain.